A literature review is an integral part of any PhD research project, as it provides an overview of the existing knowledge in a particular area of study. It is a critical evaluation of previous research studies, which helps researchers to identify research gaps and develop research questions. However, writing a comprehensive literature review can be a daunting task, especially when dealing with a vast amount of information from diverse sources.
Concept mapping is a powerful tool that can help PhD students to streamline their literature review writing process. Concept maps are visual representations of knowledge that depict the relationships between concepts and ideas. They provide a structured approach to organizing information, which helps to identify patterns, themes, and connections between different studies.
This blog explores the use of concept mapping as a tool for literature review writing in PhD research. We will discuss the benefits of using concept maps for literature review writing, the process of creating a concept map, and how to use concept maps to write an effective literature review. We will also provide examples of how concept maps have been used in previous research studies to demonstrate their effectiveness in streamlining the literature review process. By the end of this post, PhD students will have a better understanding of how concept mapping can help them to write a high-quality literature review that advances knowledge in their field.
There are benefits to using concept maps as a tool for literature review writing in PhD research projects. Here are some of the main advantages:
-
Organizing information: Concept maps provide a visual and hierarchical representation of information, which can help PhD students organize and structure their literature reviews more effectively. By mapping out the relationships between concepts and ideas, PhD students can identify patterns, themes, and gaps in the literature, and ensure that they cover all relevant aspects of their research question.
-
Facilitating critical analysis: These maps can help PhD students critically analyze the literature by providing a framework for evaluating the quality and relevance of each source. PhD students can use the map to compare and contrast different sources, identify inconsistencies and contradictions, and evaluate the strength of the evidence.
-
Enhancing creativity: Concept maps allow PhD students to explore and generate new ideas by encouraging them to make connections between different concepts and ideas. This process of brainstorming and mapping out ideas can stimulate creativity and lead to new insights and perspectives on the research question.
-
Improving communication: These maps can be a useful communication tool for PhD students, allowing them to present their literature reviews in a clear and concise manner. By using a visual representation of the literature, PhD students can communicate complex ideas and concepts more effectively to their supervisors and colleagues.
-
Saving time: Concept maps can save PhD students time in the literature review writing process by providing a structured approach to organizing and synthesizing information. This can help PhD students avoid duplicating efforts or missing relevant sources, ultimately speeding up the process of literature review writing.
Here are the main steps involved in creating a concept map for literature review writing in PhD research projects:
-
Define the research question: The first step in creating a concept map is to clearly define the research question and the main concepts and ideas that need to be addressed in the literature review. This will provide a framework for the concept map and ensure that it is focused and relevant to the research question.
-
Identify key concepts: The next step is to identify the key concepts and ideas related to the research question. This may involve reviewing the literature and identifying relevant keywords, themes, and topics that are related to the research question.
-
Organize the concepts: Once the key concepts have been identified, the next step is to organize them into a hierarchical structure. This involves identifying the main concepts or categories and then subdividing them into sub-concepts or sub-categories. The hierarchical structure of the concept map should reflect the relationships between the concepts and ideas.
-
Create the concept map: The next step is to create the concept map using a concept mapping tool. There are several software tools available for creating concept maps, such as CmapTools, MindMeister, and Lucidchart. These tools allow PhD students to create and edit their concept maps easily, add links between concepts and include notes or annotations.
-
Revise and refine: Once the concept map has been created, PhD students should review and revise it as necessary. This may involve adding or deleting concepts, adjusting the hierarchy of the map, or re-organizing the relationships between concepts.
-
Use the concept map: The final step is to use the concept map as a guide for the literature review writing process. PhD students can use the map to identify relevant sources, organize their notes and ideas, and ensure that they cover all relevant aspects of the research question.
There are several examples of how concept maps have been used in previous research studies to demonstrate their effectiveness in streamlining the literature review process. Here are a few examples:
-
In a study conducted in 2013, concept maps were used to organize and synthesize the literature on the use of evidence in nursing practice. The researchers found that using concept maps helped to identify gaps in the literature and to develop a comprehensive understanding of the research in the field.
-
In a study conducted in 2019, concept maps were used to guide the literature review process in a study of the effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on psychological outcomes in cancer patients. The researchers found that using concept maps helped to identify relevant sources, to organize information, and to develop a coherent narrative.
-
In a study conducted in 2016, concept maps were used to guide the literature review process in a study of the effectiveness of mobile health interventions for mental health. The researchers found that using concept maps helped to identify relevant sources, to organize information, and to develop a coherent narrative.
-
In a study conducted in 2008, concept maps were used to organize and synthesize the literature on the use of evidence in public health practice. The researchers found that using concept maps helped to identify relevant sources, to organize information, and to develop a comprehensive understanding of the research in the field.
Concept mapping is a visual tool used to organize and represent information. It can be used as a technique for literature review writing, but it has some limitations when compared to other methods. Some of the key limitations of using concept mapping for literature review writing include:
-
Limited depth of analysis: Concept mapping provides a high-level overview of the literature and may not capture the nuances and complexities of the research in detail. It may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the literature, especially if the research question is complex.
-
Subjectivity: The creation of a concept map is subjective, as it is influenced by the perspective and biases of the creator. The resulting map may not reflect the complete or accurate understanding of the literature.
-
Lack of flexibility: Once a concept map is created, it may be difficult to modify or add new information. This may limit the ability to incorporate new insights or developments in the field.
-
Time-consuming: Creating a concept map can be a time-consuming process, especially for a large and complex literature review. This may be a significant constraint when working with tight deadlines.
-
Limited software options: There are a limited number of software options available for creating concept maps, which may limit the ability to incorporate additional features such as annotation and collaboration.
The perception of PhD students regarding the use of concept mapping in their literature review writing process can vary depending on several factors. Some studies have explored the factors that influence the perception of PhD students regarding the use of concept mapping in literature review writing, and some of these factors include:
-
Prior experience with concept mapping: Students who have prior experience with concept mapping tend to have a positive perception of its use in literature review writing. They may be more familiar with the tool and more confident in its ability to help them organize their ideas.
-
Learning style: Students with a visual learning style tend to perceive concept mapping as a useful tool for literature review writing. Visual learners tend to process information better through diagrams, maps, and other visual aids.
-
The complexity of the research question: The complexity of the research question can influence the perceived usefulness of concept mapping. If the research question is straightforward, students may not see the need for a visual tool like concept mapping. However, if the research question is complex, students may find it useful to use concept mapping to organize their ideas and identify connections between different concepts.
-
Availability of time: The availability of time can also influence the perception of PhD students regarding the use of concept mapping. If students are pressed for time, they may perceive concept mapping as a time-consuming activity that is not worth the effort.
-
Support from the supervisor: The support and guidance provided by the supervisor can also influence the perception of PhD students regarding the use of concept mapping. If the supervisor encourages the use of concept mapping and provides guidance on how to use it effectively, students may perceive it as a useful tool.
Different types of concept maps can influence PhD students' ability to conduct the synthesis of the literature in a PhD literature review in various ways. Some of the ways that different types of concept maps can influence PhD students include:
-
Hierarchical concept maps: Hierarchical concept maps are organized in a top-down manner, where the main concept is placed at the top, and sub-concepts are arranged below it. PhD students may find hierarchical concept maps useful for synthesizing literature as they can identify relationships between the main concept and sub-concepts, which can help them understand the structure and hierarchy of the literature.
-
Spider concept maps: Spider concept maps are organized around a central concept, with sub-concepts radiating out from it. PhD students may find spider concept maps useful for synthesizing literature as they can identify relationships between the central concept and sub-concepts in a non-linear manner.
-
Flowchart concept maps: Flowchart concept maps are used to represent a series of sequential steps or actions. PhD students may find flowchart concept maps useful for synthesizing literature when they need to represent a process or sequence of events.
The use of concept mapping as a tool in the literature review process can improve the quality of the literature review, but the extent of improvement may vary depending on several factors. Some studies have found that using concept mapping as a tool in the literature review process can lead to improved quality of the literature review. Some of the ways in which the quality of the literature review may be improved by using concept mapping include:
-
Improved organization: Concept mapping can help PhD students to organize their ideas and concepts in a structured and meaningful way. This can improve the clarity and coherence of the literature review.
-
Enhanced analysis: This can help PhD students to identify relationships between concepts and ideas, which can lead to a deeper and more insightful analysis of the literature.
-
Increased efficiency: Concept mapping can help PhD students to work more efficiently, as it allows them to identify key concepts and ideas quickly and easily.
-
Reduced bias: This can help to reduce bias in the literature review process by providing a visual representation of the literature that is more objective and transparent.
Concept mapping can support the identification of research gaps and the development of research questions in a PhD literature review in several ways. Some of the ways in which concept mapping can be helpful include:
-
Identification of key concepts: Concept mapping can help to identify key concepts and ideas in the literature. By visually organizing these concepts and their relationships, PhD students can gain a better understanding of the gaps in the literature and identify areas where further research is needed.
-
Visualizing connections: This can help to visualize the connections between different concepts and ideas in the literature. This can help PhD students to identify areas where research has been done but further investigation is needed.
-
Highlighting areas of disagreement: Concept mapping can help to highlight areas of disagreement or controversy in the literature. This can help PhD students to identify gaps in knowledge and develop research questions that address these gaps.
-
Structuring research questions: This can help to structure research questions by identifying key concepts and their relationships. This can help PhD students to develop clear and focused research questions that address gaps in the literature.
In conclusion, concept mapping is a powerful tool that can streamline the literature review writing process in PhD research. By visually organizing key concepts and their relationships, concept mapping can help PhD students to identify research gaps, develop research questions, and synthesize large volumes of literature in a more efficient and effective way. However, the effectiveness of concept mapping in the literature review process depends on several factors, including the complexity of the research question and the individual PhD student's skills and experience. Therefore, it is important to provide clear instructions, examples, feedback, and resources when teaching concept mapping to PhD students. Overall, concept mapping is an effective tool that can help PhD students to produce high-quality literature reviews that advance knowledge in their respective fields.
Thank you for reading this blog